Skip to main content

Change lies in integrating the Head ,Heart and Hand and not in each of them seperately

When we being to work on transformation efforts, it is important that we are able to align the attitudes and values that will guide the transformation efforts. If individuals are not sincere , if people are not able to speak from their hearts and they don't mean what they say, then the people of the organisation will not be able to carry forward the change successfully. one of the ways to do this is to work on a three stage ,cycle of learning that was first employed by shell in their transformation efforts


Stage 1: Intellectual Understanding
When they first began their transformation efforts,  leaders at Shell began by understanding and studying it. They got consultants , read books on change ,understood change models compared models.

Similarly in change efforts, the first stage should be about making the people and the system to intellectually understand what is happening, how it will happen all from a knowledge lens.  This process will be slow , but such "studying will bring in an emotional engagement between the people and the change that is being planned



Stage 2 Emotional Engagement 
This is a personal story of Linda Peierce who was an advisor to Shell's leadership during the transformation phase. She says that her own assumption of appearing to be competent and judging herself compared to others.  But what this did was that she would not engage in wholesome discussions about the change but rather would be focus on being better than others , however through this transformation she learned to say, 'this will require thinking through'

Thus if sufficient number of people haven't made this transformation about one self, discussions around change will not be possible, or rather would be very Dry



Stage 3 Sustained Action
The intellectual insight and emotional liberation needs to be supplemented with sustained action. This means we need to find a coherence between the business proposition and the new found passion and emotional engagement. This involves viewing the entire business and its objective with a learners lens. That means, being ok with the fact that actions will require constant changing and reform



Bringing all this together
 A cycle never stops, if a sustained organisational change needs to be sustained, we don't simply take actions that will fly off, rather the actions need to be integrated with development of new theory and emotional engagement.

In this cycle you return from action to intellectual arena but in a different way. A strong emotional engagement with the problem and the willingness to be vulnerable will allow individuals to experiment and then upon reflection design some implementation of them

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...
2 comments
Read more

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to calculate ROI of Large system change intervention?

It’s true that companies spend a lot on large system change interventions; this makes it very crucial that companies are able to measure the added value. Companies always need to know if they are getting return on investment; even if we are getting ROI how can we calculate it? One of the reasons that ROI can be particularly difficult to calculate is the different factors that impact an intervention. These factors can be time and quality but are not essentially quantity and money therefore is difficult to put into a basic equation of: output / input equals productivity (output/input = value). Real problem here is that if we consider that if money as input, output will be money too. However this is not always the case in terms of large system change intervention. So how do we measure an impact which can be expressed as currency value? Calculating the full financial ROI of Large System interventions has been elusive resulting in undermining the perceived credibility of large syst...
1 comment
Read more