Skip to main content

Convergence/Divergence Model in Large System Interventions



Enabling a large system to undergo the necessary shift demands alternating between small and large group processes. The idea of combining such processes is to empower the organisation to meet its own internal and external challenges. While the organisation leverages the power of microcosms that exist within it, uniting these multiple perspectives and realities and creating a paradigm shift is imperative to the organisation's vision for the future and how the change is being facilitated real-time. Among other models like the Action Learning Model and DVF Formula that help guide organisations, the convergence/Divergence model encompasses the true idea of exploring and uniting the microcosms in the large system.
Large system changes are about not letting the value of the whole undermine the value of individual wisdom. The participation of the individuals/parts is integral to the divergence that is explored within small groups. Divergence occurs when differences in attitudes and behaviours resulting from organizational segmentation make way for specialized knowledge and mental processes. Convergence is realised when collaboration emerges among departments that are required to achieve unity of effort by the demands of the organisation’s need. The whole system expands its database to diverge into all Business units, functions, levels, personalities and further converges to combine the multiple realities produced as an outcome to this divergence. While large system interventions divulge into multitudes of possibilities, it also drives the system-wide decisions that are made for the whole. It brings together the critical mass of what people have been learning from their individual and small-group efforts into a big picture frame.
The wisdom to know when to diverge and when to shift from divergence to convergence is important because the moment of maximum differentiation is the point to start converging towards the whole. To diverge further beyond that point might be disastrous for the change and can potentially tear down the entire effort by disintegrating the individuals and parts from each other. The moment when integration occurs, differentiation immediately follows again, and the whole cycle repeats. The whole cycle of reiterating and learning in the loop in reinforced through this model.
In Large scale interventions, the Convergence/Divergence model is quintessential to how an organization can unleash and combine its wisdom by creating that productive differentiation which brings out the “whole” by productive integration.

Comments

  1. I think we can also relate this to Triple-loop learning, called also transformational learning which involves “learning how to learn” by reflecting on how we learn. The learning goes beyond insights and patterns, as a result there is a shift in understanding a context or a point of view, deepening the understanding of an issue to create a shift in perspective

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...

How to calculate ROI of Large system change intervention?

It’s true that companies spend a lot on large system change interventions; this makes it very crucial that companies are able to measure the added value. Companies always need to know if they are getting return on investment; even if we are getting ROI how can we calculate it? One of the reasons that ROI can be particularly difficult to calculate is the different factors that impact an intervention. These factors can be time and quality but are not essentially quantity and money therefore is difficult to put into a basic equation of: output / input equals productivity (output/input = value). Real problem here is that if we consider that if money as input, output will be money too. However this is not always the case in terms of large system change intervention. So how do we measure an impact which can be expressed as currency value? Calculating the full financial ROI of Large System interventions has been elusive resulting in undermining the perceived credibility of large syst...