Skip to main content

Customer Centricity Inclination for coming Change


Customer-Centricity Inclination for Coming Change

The foundation of customer centricity was laid in the marketing concept that was articulated by Peter Drucker in the mid-1950s as a business philosophy that directs all organisational activities towards filling the customers’ needs. Drucker (1954) explained that a customer defines the purpose of an organisation, determines the products the organisation would produce as well as decides whether the organisation would prosper or not. This philosophy was further reiterated by Levitt (1960) who asserted that “management must think of itself not as producing products but as providing custom- creating value satisfactions.” Levitt (1960) expounded that organisations that define their business myopically in terms of products can stagnate even if the basic needs of customers are met. Therefore an organisation must be defined in terms of meeting the customers’ needs rather than producing and selling the products. Shah et al. (2006) further enforce that the true essence of customer centricity lies not in how to sell products but rather on creating value for the customer and in the process creating value for the organisation. Customer-centric organisations have an operating and organisation model and strategy that focus on the customer (Barta, 2009). Therefore, according to Smith and Chang (2010), the customer-centric approach considers the customers of the products as assets and deals with acquiring and retaining customers.

The growing obsession with customer centricity is driven, in part, by technology. Today customers can obtain and exchange more information about the good and bad of their encounters with companies than ever before.

The focus on experience is also a function of economic development. In the developed world, where homes already overflow with physical goods, much of what we spend our money on — mortgages, life insurance, cable or Internet service — are intangible, commodity-like services that don’t really enter our consciousness unless something goes wrong. And when problems happen, a single interaction with a website, a help desk, or a service technician can have a huge influence on how we regard a brand — and whether we choose to keep spending our money with it.

Customers now expect more than personal engagement when it comes to customer centricity, they also demand engagement at the right time, on the right device, with the right message. They also expect a true, integrated cross-channel experience. This next-level form of engagement ushers in an era of what’s referred to as “extreme personalization." Extreme personalization (EP) requires engagement for context, content and behavioral data. Combined with the advancement: AI-powered marketing automation platforms, extreme personalization isn’t just possible, it’s now emerging as a competitive advantage for modern retail brands. Now, with AI, personalization is possible for both content and context.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...

How to calculate ROI of Large system change intervention?

It’s true that companies spend a lot on large system change interventions; this makes it very crucial that companies are able to measure the added value. Companies always need to know if they are getting return on investment; even if we are getting ROI how can we calculate it? One of the reasons that ROI can be particularly difficult to calculate is the different factors that impact an intervention. These factors can be time and quality but are not essentially quantity and money therefore is difficult to put into a basic equation of: output / input equals productivity (output/input = value). Real problem here is that if we consider that if money as input, output will be money too. However this is not always the case in terms of large system change intervention. So how do we measure an impact which can be expressed as currency value? Calculating the full financial ROI of Large System interventions has been elusive resulting in undermining the perceived credibility of large syst...