Skip to main content

Customer Centricity Inclination for coming Change


Customer-Centricity Inclination for Coming Change

The foundation of customer centricity was laid in the marketing concept that was articulated by Peter Drucker in the mid-1950s as a business philosophy that directs all organisational activities towards filling the customers’ needs. Drucker (1954) explained that a customer defines the purpose of an organisation, determines the products the organisation would produce as well as decides whether the organisation would prosper or not. This philosophy was further reiterated by Levitt (1960) who asserted that “management must think of itself not as producing products but as providing custom- creating value satisfactions.” Levitt (1960) expounded that organisations that define their business myopically in terms of products can stagnate even if the basic needs of customers are met. Therefore an organisation must be defined in terms of meeting the customers’ needs rather than producing and selling the products. Shah et al. (2006) further enforce that the true essence of customer centricity lies not in how to sell products but rather on creating value for the customer and in the process creating value for the organisation. Customer-centric organisations have an operating and organisation model and strategy that focus on the customer (Barta, 2009). Therefore, according to Smith and Chang (2010), the customer-centric approach considers the customers of the products as assets and deals with acquiring and retaining customers.

The growing obsession with customer centricity is driven, in part, by technology. Today customers can obtain and exchange more information about the good and bad of their encounters with companies than ever before.

The focus on experience is also a function of economic development. In the developed world, where homes already overflow with physical goods, much of what we spend our money on — mortgages, life insurance, cable or Internet service — are intangible, commodity-like services that don’t really enter our consciousness unless something goes wrong. And when problems happen, a single interaction with a website, a help desk, or a service technician can have a huge influence on how we regard a brand — and whether we choose to keep spending our money with it.

Customers now expect more than personal engagement when it comes to customer centricity, they also demand engagement at the right time, on the right device, with the right message. They also expect a true, integrated cross-channel experience. This next-level form of engagement ushers in an era of what’s referred to as “extreme personalization." Extreme personalization (EP) requires engagement for context, content and behavioral data. Combined with the advancement: AI-powered marketing automation platforms, extreme personalization isn’t just possible, it’s now emerging as a competitive advantage for modern retail brands. Now, with AI, personalization is possible for both content and context.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...

Open Space technology: Benefits and Barriers

Open space technology Open space technology was founded by Harrison Owen in the 1985 out of a desire to “open the space” for people to self-organize around a purpose. It is a methodology that helps meetings, conferences, community summit events of individuals and groups, focussing on a specific, important purpose or task however at the onset no formal agenda is placed. The concept therefore, thrives on ambiguity and thus is challenging. It has 5 to 2000 players and may be organised for a day to up to three days. Ideal conditions  Open Space Technology works best when four conditions are present: High level of complexity, such that no single person or small group fully understands or can solve the issue. Diversity, in terms of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of people (from different backgrounds & experiences) required for a successful resolution. Real or potential conflict, which implies that people genuinely care about the ...