Skip to main content

How to calculate ROI of Large system change intervention?



It’s true that companies spend a lot on large system change interventions; this makes it very crucial that companies are able to measure the added value. Companies always need to know if they are getting return on investment; even if we are getting ROI how can we calculate it? One of the reasons that ROI can be particularly difficult to calculate is the different factors that impact an intervention. These factors can be time and quality but are not essentially quantity and money therefore is difficult to put into a basic equation of: output / input equals productivity (output/input = value).
Real problem here is that if we consider that if money as input, output will be money too. However this is not always the case in terms of large system change intervention. So how do we measure an impact which can be expressed as currency value?
Calculating the full financial ROI of Large System interventions has been elusive resulting in undermining the perceived credibility of large system intervention’s strategic importance among key executive leaders. But at the same time companies need to understand – Outcomes of Large System Change interventions are intangible.
Intangible measures are the benefits or detriments directly linked to an intervention that cannot or should not be converted to monetary values. These are becoming crucial to organization’s success. Some of the examples are –
·         Accountability
·         intellectual capital
·         Alliances
·         Innovation and creativity
·         Attention
·         Job satisfaction
·         Loyalty
·         Capability
·         Capacity
·         Organizational commitment
The good news is that more of these intangibles are being considered tangibles. For example, customer satisfaction, few organizations had a clue as to the monetary value of customer satisfaction. Now more firms have taken measures to link customer satisfaction directly to revenues, profits, etc.

So, how to measure the ROI through these intangibles?

1.       Ask stakeholders – Asking stakeholder works the well. Getting feedback from the people who are impacted by Large Scale Change Intervention are even better to get an answer. 5 points Likert’s scale which defines agreement or disagreement of respondents over the desired results.
2.       Linking tangibles to intangibles – Statistics can do wonders here. Once the casual relationship is verified in between these two factors, if there is correlation does exist or not can be checked. Consequently, additional analysis, other empirical evidence, and supporting data could pinpoint the actual causal effect.
3.       Development of Index – This approach is more scientific and reliable. In this method various tangible and intangible data items are combined to make up particular index value. An index is a single score representing some complex factor that is constructed by aggregating the values of several different measures. Intangibles are can be combined with a variety of tangibles to reflect the performance of a company, business unit or function.

How do we convert it to Money?

1.       Focus on unit of measure: Specific unit of which ROI to be measured should be defined precisely e.g Job satisfaction
2.       Determine value of each unit: A classic relationship is the correlation between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Suppose that in a project designed to improve job satisfaction, a value is needed to reflect changes in the job satisfaction index. A predetermined relationship showing the correlation between increases in job satisfaction and reductions in turnover can directly link the two measures. Using standard data or external studies, the cost of turnover can easily be determined as described earlier. Therefore, a change in job satisfaction can be immediately converted to a monetary value, or at least an approximate value.
3.       Calculate the change in performance data: How the value units have changed after the Large Systems Change Interventions can be calculated.
4.       Calculate value of improvement: As we know now approximate value of intangible unit, before and after difference can be calculated and convert it into the money.

This method can give approximate value of different intangible factors associated with Large System Change Intervention.  

Comments

  1. Adding on to the ROI or measuring the effectiveness of any Large system intervention. It requires some time to reflect the results. Evaluation should be done timely and should start when you start observing the results.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...

Open Space technology: Benefits and Barriers

Open space technology Open space technology was founded by Harrison Owen in the 1985 out of a desire to “open the space” for people to self-organize around a purpose. It is a methodology that helps meetings, conferences, community summit events of individuals and groups, focussing on a specific, important purpose or task however at the onset no formal agenda is placed. The concept therefore, thrives on ambiguity and thus is challenging. It has 5 to 2000 players and may be organised for a day to up to three days. Ideal conditions  Open Space Technology works best when four conditions are present: High level of complexity, such that no single person or small group fully understands or can solve the issue. Diversity, in terms of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of people (from different backgrounds & experiences) required for a successful resolution. Real or potential conflict, which implies that people genuinely care about the ...