Skip to main content

Part 1 - How Whole System Interventions?

In the previous post, the background of Whole System Interventions(WSI) i.e. what does it mean and why did it come into the picture has been described. As mentioned WSI is and approach and it can be met via multiple methods. This post will describe the methods will be described in brief by exploring their processes, and the role of a consultant in each of them

Future Search 


The objective of Future Search is to create and enact an organization that the stakeholders desire. It is based on egalitarian notions and the process involves inviting select stakeholders to a conference. Thereafter, data is gathered from all participants, the same participants analyze and reduce the data in a manageable and meaningful way, then work towards establishing an agreement among themselves participants based on commonly held views and ideals. The conference usually ends with a long list of action steps that the group has collectively agreed upon and specific individuals have taken responsibility to implement.

The role of a consultant is that of a manager of the process who ensures that the participants make decisions by themselves which in turn creates ownership.

Search Conference


A search conference enables members of an organization to plan for its desirable future. It has 3 stages, the first stage requires the participants to engage in exercises that would them to learn about their turbulent, uncertain global environment. The second stage involves reflection of the systems past and present to make a decision on how the future(desirable to all) of the system should look like. The third stage involves developing a plan to achieve the goal of a desirable future.

Though each search conference is enacted in different ways, the generic process is as follows:

1. Changes in the World Important Into the Future Desirable and Probable Future of the World 
2. Our System's History: Where We Came From 
3. Our Current System: What to Keep, Drop, and Create 
4. Our Most Desirable System 
5. Strategies and Actions Plans 
6. Community Grows and Diffuses Through Implementation

The role of a consultant is similar to that of Future Search, wherein he/she is just a manager of the process who ensures that the participants make decisions by themselves which in turn creates ownership. The conference has no presenters, lectures, speeches, keynote addresses, simulations, and exercises, or training sessions. 

Open Space


Open Space is a technique wherein individuals are invited to share their ideas and opinions provided they are willing to take up responsibility from them. Here responsibility means organizing people and taking the idea to fruition. There are four rules and one law guiding the method.

The Four Rules state: 
1. Whoever comes are the right people 
2. Whatever happens, is the only thing that could have 
3. Whenever it starts is the right time 
4. When it’s over, it’s over

The Law of Two Feet states that: “If, during the course of the gathering, any person finds themselves in a situation where they are neither learning nor contributing, they can go to some more productive place.”

The role of the change agent is to introduce the concept, the theme, the simple process the group will follow to organize and create a record, where to put things up and find out what is happening, the Law of Two Feet, and the Principles of Open Space.  Then, the facilitator also invites people on to the stage and announce the issue that he/she cares about. The process goes on till all the issues have been put up on the wall, thereafter the facilitator calls on people to sign up for what they are interested in and take responsibility for their schedules.
People participate in discussions, and all relevant data is put on their space/wall. In the closing circle, all the members are asked to reconvene to discuss their key learnings and are encouraged to continue working on the issue.

In the next post, the other methods of intervention will be described

For more information





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...
2 comments
Read more

Open Space technology: Benefits and Barriers

Open space technology Open space technology was founded by Harrison Owen in the 1985 out of a desire to “open the space” for people to self-organize around a purpose. It is a methodology that helps meetings, conferences, community summit events of individuals and groups, focussing on a specific, important purpose or task however at the onset no formal agenda is placed. The concept therefore, thrives on ambiguity and thus is challenging. It has 5 to 2000 players and may be organised for a day to up to three days. Ideal conditions  Open Space Technology works best when four conditions are present: High level of complexity, such that no single person or small group fully understands or can solve the issue. Diversity, in terms of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of people (from different backgrounds & experiences) required for a successful resolution. Real or potential conflict, which implies that people genuinely care about the ...
Post a Comment
Read more