Skip to main content

Practicing Radical Transparency in Large System Interventions



Don’t we all fear our demons? And haven’t we all preached facing our fears straight up one time or the other? Where do we go from here?
Towards Radical transparency says, Ray Dalio!
Ray Dalio’s thoughts on Radical transparency and Radical truth have immense potential in the
process of unlearning and growth mindset that drives Leaders of Large systems in the 21st century. We all know of those unspoken things within Large systems amongst employees, managers and Leaders. Addressing those things that normal people would rather hide -  like the mistakes we make, the failures we face, and the weaknesses we hold as a responsibility to self and others might just turn the whole game of unlearning around.
Why is there a need for Radical transparency? Science suggests that the tendency to get carried away by Confirmation bias – the human tendency to look for things that confirm or validate the biases or opinions we hold is very high. More so because research suggests that 95% of humans think they have very high self-awareness but only a meagre 10-15% of them actually are self-aware. Considering the case of Leader, the higher they transcend in their career and the more power they hold, the higher their negligence towards self-awareness.
When people are confronted with their biases, more often than not they tend to move away from the sources of such feedback. This is because people tend to have very high held opinions about themselves and when they are confronted about their biases, it conflicts with their idea of self and threatens our belief system. The result is a conscious effort to remove the threat from our life. However, a contrasting reaction takes place when people give positive feedback - people tend to get closer to these people quickly.
Making the problem areas transparent, brings them to an acceptable level from where they can be constructively worked upon. Transparency creates a space for trust, with customers, employees and all other stakeholders. The trust factor further determines how a particular entity is found valued.
While Ray Dalio realises that it is difficult for people to get comfortable with the uncomfortable realities, it is also extremely powerful in creating a climate that enables people to raise thoughts about what evidence is at odds with others in our environment without taking it personally. The benefit is large for the self and the organisation. According to Ray Dalio, Radical transparency is a way to build independent thinkers who are okay with disagreeing. In order to create meaningful work and meaningful relationships, independent thinkers who will even go against consensus are important.
Some suggestions from Ray Dalio to activate Radical transparency in Organisations that realise the need to unlearn are:
Agreeing to disagree: Setting up a private agreement with those who interact with you regularly with a mutually agreed motive for development. Two questions guide this conversation – Should I tell you what I really think? and Can you tell me what you really think?
Drawing the lines: Radical means the extreme. But this could also be subjective to the culture that the organisation is in. Most companies set these boundaries at the point of legality. Making sure the organisation is aware of the non-negotiables is important for mutual respect.
Opening up the doors: Let the no-secrets policy flourish as the leaders practise honesty and open sharing. It takes the leaders to have deeper conversations to continuously grow and unleash the new energy into the organisation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...
2 comments
Read more

Open Space technology: Benefits and Barriers

Open space technology Open space technology was founded by Harrison Owen in the 1985 out of a desire to “open the space” for people to self-organize around a purpose. It is a methodology that helps meetings, conferences, community summit events of individuals and groups, focussing on a specific, important purpose or task however at the onset no formal agenda is placed. The concept therefore, thrives on ambiguity and thus is challenging. It has 5 to 2000 players and may be organised for a day to up to three days. Ideal conditions  Open Space Technology works best when four conditions are present: High level of complexity, such that no single person or small group fully understands or can solve the issue. Diversity, in terms of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of people (from different backgrounds & experiences) required for a successful resolution. Real or potential conflict, which implies that people genuinely care about the ...
Post a Comment
Read more