Skip to main content

System Thinking Paradigm


SYSTEM THINKING PARADIGM

Systems innovation can be seen to be based upon the premise that the system we are interested in is not functioning. On a foundational level or a vision of how the whole system could be better. When we extrapolate this out we can recognize that many of the systems in our society and economy are not functioning as they could. We often hear the word broken associated with health care or educational systems. There is widespread recognition to the unsustainability of many systems such as how we do food production to how we manufacture retail and use consumer goods. This leads us to the conclusion that maybe there's something not quite right about this whole set of systems that make up our economies.

Once one comes to this insight one is then invariably driven to make some inquiry about why and what might be done about it. A superficial inquiry would lead us to the conclusion that whoever is managing these systems is just doing a bad job. If we could just replace those people and get the good guys in charge then all would be fine again but a more prolonged and sustained inquiry would lead us to question the structure of the system. These actors are within if we sustain our inquiry even farther we may come to the recognition that how we design and manage these systems. It is a product of the models we hold about the way the world is and more broadly our processes of reasoning that go into the decisions.

We make this is the conclusion that systems thinkers typically come to that the way we organize our world is a product of the models that we use and if there is something fundamentally dysfunctional with our organizations. Then it is unlikely to be out there but instead a product of our reasoning and modelling. The imbalances in the world are typically traced back to imbalances in our reasoning the position. That an excess of a particular mode of reasoning called analytical reductionism has resulted in an imbalance to how we understand design and manage our world.

Synthetic holism and analytical reductionism. It is important to understand these two modes of reasoning as much of what is talked about in systems and complexity theory follow from them. Analytical reductionism is a process of reasoning where we try to understand something by removing it from its environment decomposing it into individual parts studying the properties of those parts and then putting them back together. So as to derive an account of the whole as some combination of these individual building blocks. It is based upon the assumption that the system is nothing more than the sum of its parts and that the system is relatively closed in contrast synthetic holism is a process of reasoning where we try to understand something by looking at it in relation to the whole system or environment that it forms part of its interaction with other systems and how it is shaped by those interactions in the overall context.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...
2 comments
Read more

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to calculate ROI of Large system change intervention?

It’s true that companies spend a lot on large system change interventions; this makes it very crucial that companies are able to measure the added value. Companies always need to know if they are getting return on investment; even if we are getting ROI how can we calculate it? One of the reasons that ROI can be particularly difficult to calculate is the different factors that impact an intervention. These factors can be time and quality but are not essentially quantity and money therefore is difficult to put into a basic equation of: output / input equals productivity (output/input = value). Real problem here is that if we consider that if money as input, output will be money too. However this is not always the case in terms of large system change intervention. So how do we measure an impact which can be expressed as currency value? Calculating the full financial ROI of Large System interventions has been elusive resulting in undermining the perceived credibility of large syst...
1 comment
Read more