Skip to main content

Understanding the whole : Sensemaking with the whole in the room.


The LSI-approach is aimed at sustainable change, rooted in the development of collective learning and building capacity for change. An assumption is that sustainable experience is created by engaging the whole person (mind, body, spirit), because reality is defined by meanings as well as facts. The underlying worldview is that everything that lives wants to grow, to flourish, and that development of capacities is possible under the right circumstances ref ( The Living Company by Arie de Geus ). Collective learning is developed through action learning, and by working together with the goal of looking for new meaning and growth described as looking for new meaning as ‘sensemaking’, a process with seven properties As explained by Karl  “: "If people start to act (enactment), they generate tangible results (cues), in a context (social), and this helps them to discover (retrospectively) what is going on (ongoing), what has to be explained (plausibility), and what has to be done (identity enhancement)".
Working together in highly diverse groups , sensemaking is the need for people to be part of a group, and the need to work together on a larger goal that makes sense to them, something they can believe in. it is a very humanizing experience that travels with participants . Meeting and working face-to-face plays an important role in sensemaking  “If people want to share meaning, then they need to talk about their shared experience in close proximity to its occurrence and hammer out a common way to encode it and talk about it”. dialogues and arguments are bound to happen but they need not to be seen as a problem that has to be solved, but as a source of diversity for renewal.
To address as many learning styles of participants as possible, a diversity of work forms is used. Although some methods emphasise dialogue, visualising of patterns and results plays an important role in LSIs. It has been suggested that visual reasoning is more universal than verbal reasoning and that it enablle groups to contribute as well. Collective meetings, working on common ground Marvin Weisbord and Sandra Janoff explain: “Fred Emery, a pioneer in his field, held that when two people work on a common task outside themselves they are more likely to improve their relationship than if they confront one another’s habits, styles, and quirks directly in the absence of any other task.”

Characteristics of LSI that are mainly based on the principle of understanding the whole, of looking for common ground are:
· Looking for new meanings
· Face-to-face communication
· Addressing a diversity of qualities of participants
· Use of a diversity of work forms to meet all learning styles
· Working with emerging processes
· Focus on common ground and future action
· Rationalizing and acknowledging of conflicts
· Need for facilitators

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Foundational Structures of Systemic Thinking: Reinforcing and Balancing loop

A  reinforcing loop  is one in which an activity creates an outcome that impacts business as usual activity in this manner bringing about development or decay. The reinforcing loop is one of the two basic structures of systems thinking, the other being the Balancing Loop.  Because of the manner in which this structure reinforces itself it generally produces exponential growth or decline. This exponential change may be unnoticeable for a period of time until it reaches a certain threshold. The structure then seems to change very rapidly causing one to wonder how it began all at once, when in fact it really didn't. The growth just wasn't substantial enough to be noticed. A  balancing loop  tries to move things from the current state (the way things are) to the desired state (goal or objective) through some action (whatever is done to reach the goal). A balancing loop is representative of any situation where there is a goa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reinforcing Loop in Action

A system represents a complex dynamic between its various sub-units. One of the most visible parts of a system is the reinforcing loop. The reinforcing loop is perhaps most visible because it works on an incremental basis. It is that fundamental element in a system that defines growth and increment. As defined by Senge, a system is said to be in a reinforcing loop when each small action builds on the other. This snowball effect of each action building on the previous one can either lead to a virtuous cycle or can actually lead to decline of the system. Most often reinforcing loop, perhaps because of it name, generates a perception of it being that element of the system that fosters growth, thus giving it a positive connotation. In systems thinking however, the concept is far broader. It refers to those elements or actions within the system that lead to amplification and maintenance of certain behaviours. This amplification does not necessarily mean that the behaviour that is gen...
2 comments
Read more

Open Space technology: Benefits and Barriers

Open space technology Open space technology was founded by Harrison Owen in the 1985 out of a desire to “open the space” for people to self-organize around a purpose. It is a methodology that helps meetings, conferences, community summit events of individuals and groups, focussing on a specific, important purpose or task however at the onset no formal agenda is placed. The concept therefore, thrives on ambiguity and thus is challenging. It has 5 to 2000 players and may be organised for a day to up to three days. Ideal conditions  Open Space Technology works best when four conditions are present: High level of complexity, such that no single person or small group fully understands or can solve the issue. Diversity, in terms of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of people (from different backgrounds & experiences) required for a successful resolution. Real or potential conflict, which implies that people genuinely care about the ...
Post a Comment
Read more